TEC: A Collection of Human Trial-and-error Trajectories for Problem Solving

arXiv cs.CL / 4/9/2026

📰 NewsSignals & Early TrendsModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes a new data annotation platform and dataset, Trial-and-Error Collection (TEC), to capture how humans perform trial-and-error problem solving in realistic settings.
  • TEC records complete user trajectories across multiple trials and collects post-feedback reflections, addressing the lack of detailed training data for this behavior.
  • The dataset includes 46 participants completing 58 tasks, yielding 5,370 trial trajectories and error reflections derived from 41,229 webpages.
  • In experiments comparing humans to LLMs, the authors report that humans achieve substantially higher accuracy, suggesting human trial-and-error strategies remain more effective than current LLM approaches.
  • The platform and dataset are made publicly available to support research into human trial-and-error behavior and the development of more capable AI systems.

Abstract

Trial-and-error is a fundamental strategy for humans to solve complex problems and a necessary capability for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems operating in real-world environments. Although several trial-and-error AI techniques have recently been proposed, most of them rely on simple heuristics designed by researchers and achieve limited performance gains. The core issue is the absence of appropriate data: current models cannot learn from detailed records of how humans actually conduct trial-and-error in practice. To address this gap, we introduce a data annotation platform and a corresponding dataset, termed Trial-and-Error Collection (TEC). The platform records users' complete trajectories across multiple trials and collects their reflections after receiving error feedback. Using this platform, we record the problem-solving processes of 46 participants on 58 tasks, resulting in 5,370 trial trajectories along with error reflections across 41,229 webpages. With this dataset, we observe that humans achieve substantially higher accuracy compared to LLMs, which demonstrates that humans are more effective in trial-and-error than LLMs. We believe that the TEC platform and dataset provide a valuable foundation for understanding human trial-and-error behavior and for developing more capable AI systems. Platform and dataset are publicly available.