I Came, I Saw, I Explained: Benchmarking Multimodal LLMs on Figurative Meaning in Memes
arXiv cs.CL / 3/25/2026
💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The study benchmarks eight state-of-the-art generative multimodal LLMs on detecting and explaining six types of figurative meaning in memes across three datasets.
- Results show a pervasive bias: models tend to predict figurative meaning even when it is not present in the meme.
- Human evaluation indicates that model explanations may not reliably support the predicted label and can be insufficiently faithful to the meme’s original content.
- Qualitative analysis finds that correct label predictions do not necessarily come with explanation quality or content-faithfulness.
- The work highlights a key limitation in how MLLMs align visual-text interpretation with grounded figurative semantics and explainability in real multimodal settings.
Related Articles
Santa Augmentcode Intent Ep.6
Dev.to

Your Agent Hired Another Agent. The Output Was Garbage. The Money's Gone.
Dev.to
Big Tech firms are accelerating AI investments and integration, while regulators and companies focus on safety and responsible adoption.
Dev.to

Palantir’s billionaire CEO says only two kinds of people will succeed in the AI era: trade workers — ‘or you’re neurodivergent’
Reddit r/artificial
Scaffolded Test-First Prompting: Get Correct Code From the First Run
Dev.to