Toward Automated Robustness Evaluation of Mathematical Reasoning

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in various reasoning-intensive tasks. However, these models exhibit unexpected brittleness, often failing on simple variations of the same underlying task. Existing robustness evaluations predominantly rely on hand-crafted templates or a limited set of perturbation rules. Consequently, such approaches lack the adaptability to probe latent vulnerabilities unique to specific models and remain susceptible to data contamination. To address this, we propose the Math Stress Tester (MaSTer), an automated framework inspired by software stress testing. MaSTer generates adversarial variants via a multi-round rewrite-verify loop, ensuring semantic consistency while successfully inducing model failure. Our framework generates benchmark variants dynamically for each LLM, thus minimizing the risk of data contamination. Experiments on GSM8K and MATH-500 demonstrate the effectiveness of MaSTer on mathematical tasks. Additionally, we validate the framework's extensibility to non-mathematical tasks, highlighting its broad applicability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the synthesized variants generated by MaSTer can be utilized as a fine-tuning dataset to significantly enhance the model's robustness.