Chain of Uncertain Rewards with Large Language Models for Reinforcement Learning

arXiv cs.LG / 4/16/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper proposes the Chain of Uncertain Rewards (CoUR) framework to make reinforcement learning reward function design less labor-intensive by reducing redundancy and addressing intermediate decision-point uncertainty.
  • CoUR uses LLMs to quantify code uncertainty and applies a similarity selection mechanism that blends textual and semantic analysis to reuse relevant reward components.
  • It combines this selection approach with Bayesian optimization over decoupled reward terms to search more efficiently for effective reward feedback.
  • The authors evaluate CoUR on nine IsaacGym environments and all 20 tasks in the Bidexterous Manipulation benchmark, reporting improved performance and significantly reduced reward-evaluation cost.
  • Overall, the work positions LLM-assisted, uncertainty-aware reward engineering as a route to more robust and scalable RL training workflows.

Abstract

Designing effective reward functions is a cornerstone of reinforcement learning (RL), yet it remains a challenging and labor-intensive process due to the inefficiencies and inconsistencies inherent in traditional methods. Existing methods often rely on extensive manual design and evaluation steps, which are prone to redundancy and overlook local uncertainties at intermediate decision points. To address these challenges, we propose the Chain of Uncertain Rewards (CoUR), a novel framework that integrates large language models (LLMs) to streamline reward function design and evaluation in RL environments. Specifically, our CoUR introduces code uncertainty quantification with a similarity selection mechanism that combines textual and semantic analyses to identify and reuse the most relevant reward function components. By reducing redundant evaluations and leveraging Bayesian optimization on decoupled reward terms, CoUR enables a more efficient and robust search for optimal reward feedback. We comprehensively evaluate CoUR across nine original environments from IsaacGym and all 20 tasks from the Bidexterous Manipulation benchmark. The experimental results demonstrate that CoUR not only achieves better performance but also significantly lowers the cost of reward evaluations.