Camera-ready paranoia [D]

Reddit r/MachineLearning / 4/16/2026

💬 OpinionTools & Practical Usage

Key Points

  • A Reddit user asks how to handle anxiety about submitting a camera-ready version to a CVPR workshop (not the main CVPR conference) and worries it may be rejected due to minor formatting or submission mistakes.
  • They ask when authors typically receive confirmation that a paper will be included in the proceedings, noting their status shows “In production.”
  • They report taking common precautions—running the paper through the express PDF tool, using the CVPR 2026 template, and keeping acknowledgments within the 8-page limit—but remain concerned.
  • The thread centers on practical submission-status interpretation and checklist-style reassurance rather than new research or technical developments.

How do you guys deal with camera-ready paranoia? I just submitted my camera-ready version to CVPRW (not even the real conference, just a workshop...) and I'm afraid I've done something wrong and it will get rejected because of it...

Any idea on when we get confirmation it will be placed in the proceedings? I see my paper status as being "In production" but don't know what that means...

Edit: I ran it though the express pdf tool and it "passed", and I also used the CVPR 2026 template, and only went over 8 pages for the Acknowledgments, but still worried...

submitted by /u/AdministrativeRub484
[link] [comments]