Abstract
Optimal wireless transmitter placement is a central task in radio-network planning, yet exhaustive search becomes prohibitively expensive at scale. This paper studies the single-transmitter setting under a fixed learned propagation surrogate, where exhaustive per-pixel evaluation remains tractable and provides surrogate-exact ground truth. We introduce a dataset of 167,525 urban scenarios (RadioMapSeer-Deployment) with dual surrogate-exact labels for coverage-optimal and power-optimal transmitter locations. Ground-truth analysis reveals an asymmetric coverage-power trade-off: coverage-optimal placement sacrifices 13.86% of received power, whereas power-optimal placement sacrifices only 5.50% of coverage; the best achievable balanced placement lies at \bar{d}=2.60 from the ideal point (100%,100%). We evaluate two learning formulations: indirect heatmap-based models that predict received-power radio maps, and direct score-map models that predict the objective landscape over feasible transmitter locations. Within the heatmap family, discriminative models deliver one-shot predictions 1350-2400x faster than exhaustive search, while diffusion models additionally support multi-sample inference that improves single-objective performance and, by reusing the same sample pool under a balanced criterion, recovers strong balanced placements without explicit multi-objective training. Dual score-map strategies combining power and coverage score maps match the exhaustive balanced optimum (\bar{d}=2.60) and remain close across smaller candidate budgets, at 14-22x speedups after candidate re-evaluation. Both formulations admit very fast one-shot inference; on this benchmark, dual score-map methods are strongest for balanced placement, whereas heatmap formulations remain attractive for their physically meaningful intermediate maps and, in the diffusion setting, for inference-time search.
