INTRYGUE: Induction-Aware Entropy Gating for Reliable RAG Uncertainty Estimation

arXiv cs.AI / 3/24/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper argues that common entropy-based uncertainty quantification methods can misbehave in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) because induction mechanisms interact with internal components that inflate predictive entropy.
  • It identifies a “tug-of-war” effect: induction heads help produce grounded answers by copying relevant content, but they also activate previously established “entropy neurons,” leading the model to report false uncertainty even when outputs are correct.
  • The proposed method, INTRYGUE, gates predictive entropy using induction-head activation patterns to better reflect true uncertainty in RAG scenarios.
  • Experiments across four RAG benchmarks and six open-source LLMs (4B–13B) show INTRYGUE consistently matches or outperforms multiple uncertainty quantification baselines.
  • The work concludes that more reliable hallucination detection in RAG can come from combining predictive uncertainty with mechanistically interpretable signals tied to context utilization.

Abstract

While retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) significantly improves the factual reliability of LLMs, it does not eliminate hallucinations, so robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) remains essential. In this paper, we reveal that standard entropy-based UQ methods often fail in RAG settings due to a mechanistic paradox. An internal "tug-of-war" inherent to context utilization appears: while induction heads promote grounded responses by copying the correct answer, they collaterally trigger the previously established "entropy neurons". This interaction inflates predictive entropy, causing the model to signal false uncertainty on accurate outputs. To address this, we propose INTRYGUE (Induction-Aware Entropy Gating for Uncertainty Estimation), a mechanistically grounded method that gates predictive entropy based on the activation patterns of induction heads. Evaluated across four RAG benchmarks and six open-source LLMs (4B to 13B parameters), INTRYGUE consistently matches or outperforms a wide range of UQ baselines. Our findings demonstrate that hallucination detection in RAG benefits from combining predictive uncertainty with interpretable, internal signals of context utilization.