An RTK-SLAM Dataset for Absolute Accuracy Evaluation in GNSS-Degraded Environments

arXiv cs.RO / 4/9/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper argues that the common SLAM evaluation metric ATE can be misleading for RTK-SLAM because it applies an optimal SE(3) alignment that absorbs global drift and systematic errors.
  • It introduces a geodetically referenced RTK-SLAM dataset and evaluation methodology that decouple GNSS/RTK from ground truth by using an RTK receiver only as an input while obtaining ground truth from a geodetic total station.
  • The dataset includes two scenes collected with a handheld RTK-SLAM device and is designed to better expose how absolute positioning accuracy behaves in GNSS-degraded environments.
  • Experiments across multiple RTK-SLAM variants (LiDAR-inertial, visual-inertial, and LiDAR-visual-inertial) plus standalone RTK show that SE(3) alignment can underestimate absolute error by up to 76%.
  • Results indicate RTK-SLAM retains centimeter-to-decimeter global accuracy where standalone RTK degrades sharply (to tens of meters indoors), and the dataset, calibration files, and scripts are publicly released.

Abstract

RTK-SLAM systems integrate simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) with real-time kinematic (RTK) GNSS positioning, promising both relative consistency and globally referenced coordinates for efficient georeferenced surveying. A critical and underappreciated issue is that the standard evaluation metric, Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE), first fits an optimal rigid-body transformation between the estimated trajectory and reference before computing errors. This so-called SE(3) alignment absorbs global drift and systematic errors, making trajectories appear more accurate than they are in practice, and is unsuitable for evaluating the global accuracy of RTK-SLAM. We present a geodetically referenced dataset and evaluation methodology that expose this gap. A key design principle is that the RTK receiver is used solely as a system input, while ground truth is established independently via a geodetic total station. This separation is absent from all existing datasets, where GNSS typically serves as (part of) the ground truth. The dataset is collected with a handheld RTK-SLAM device, comprising two scenes. We evaluate LiDAR-inertial, visual-inertial, and LiDAR-visual-inertial RTK-SLAM systems alongside standalone RTK, reporting direct global accuracy and SE(3)-aligned relative accuracy to make the gap explicit. Results show that SE(3) alignment can underestimate absolute positioning error by up to 76\%. RTK-SLAM achieves centimeter-level absolute accuracy in open-sky conditions and maintains decimeter-level global accuracy indoors, where standalone RTK degrades to tens of meters. The dataset, calibration files, and evaluation scripts are publicly available at https://rtk-slam-dataset.github.io/.