Working Paper: Towards a Category-theoretic Comparative Framework for Artificial General Intelligence
arXiv cs.AI / 4/1/2026
💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper argues that AGI lacks a single formal definition and that existing benchmarking frameworks are limited, motivating a new unified approach.
- It proposes an algebraic, category-theoretic comparative framework to describe, analyze, and compare different AGI architectures such as RL, Universal AI, Active Inference, CRL, and schema-based learning.
- As an initial exercise, it works through category-theoretic formulations involving RL, causal RL, and SBL, aiming to surface both commonalities and differences across these architectures.
- The framework is intended to support formal definitions of architectural, informational, and semantic properties, along with empirical evaluation in environments with explicitly characterized features.
- The authors position the work as a first step toward a broader research program integrating agent realization, agent–environment interaction, behavioral development over time, and evaluation under the same formal foundation.
Related Articles

Black Hat Asia
AI Business

Big Tech firms are accelerating AI investments and integration, while regulators and companies focus on safety and responsible adoption.
Dev.to

Day 6: I Stopped Writing Articles and Started Hunting Bounties
Dev.to

Early Detection of Breast Cancer using SVM Classifier Technique
Dev.to

I Started Writing for Others. It Changed How I Learn.
Dev.to