The role of System 1 and System 2 semantic memory structure in human and LLM biases

arXiv cs.CL / 4/15/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper investigates how implicit biases in humans and LLMs may map onto dual-process cognition (System 1 vs System 2) by modeling both as semantic-memory networks with different structures.
  • Using comparable datasets created by humans and LLMs, the authors evaluate network-based metrics to test how semantic memory structure relates to implicit gender bias.
  • Results indicate that semantic-memory structures are “irreducible” only in humans, implying LLMs may lack certain human-like conceptual knowledge needed for that property.
  • The study finds semantic memory structure correlates consistently with implicit bias only in humans, where greater reliance on System 2–like structures is associated with lower bias.
  • Overall, the findings suggest bias regulation mechanisms tied to specific conceptual knowledge may be fundamental to human cognition but not directly present or equivalent in LLM cognition.

Abstract

Implicit biases in both humans and large language models (LLMs) pose significant societal risks. Dual process theories propose that biases arise primarily from associative System 1 thinking, while deliberative System 2 thinking mitigates bias, but the cognitive mechanisms that give rise to this phenomenon remain poorly understood. To better understand what underlies this duality in humans, and possibly in LLMs, we model System 1 and System 2 thinking as semantic memory networks with distinct structures, built from comparable datasets generated by both humans and LLMs. We then investigate how these distinct semantic memory structures relate to implicit gender bias using network-based evaluation metrics. We find that semantic memory structures are irreducible only in humans, suggesting that LLMs lack certain types of human-like conceptual knowledge. Moreover, semantic memory structure relates consistently to implicit bias only in humans, with lower levels of bias in System~2 structures. These findings suggest that certain types of conceptual knowledge contribute to bias regulation in humans, but not in LLMs, highlighting fundamental differences between human and machine cognition.