When PINNs Go Wrong: Pseudo-Time Stepping Against Spurious Solutions
arXiv cs.LG / 4/28/2026
📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research
Key Points
- The paper argues that PINNs can converge to physically incorrect (spurious) PDE solutions even when the training residual loss is small, due to a fundamental weakness of using only empirical PDE residual loss.
- It revisits pseudo-time stepping and claims its key benefit is not just optimization easing; when paired with collocation-point resampling, it helps detect and avoid spurious solutions during training.
- The authors find pseudo-time stepping’s success depends strongly on the pseudo step size, and this step size cannot be reliably tuned using training loss alone.
- They propose an adaptive pseudo-time stepping method that chooses step size via a finite-difference surrogate of the local residual Jacobian to take the largest locally stable step without manual per-problem tuning.
- Across multiple PDE benchmarks, the proposed adaptive strategy improves both accuracy and robustness, with accompanying code and data released on GitHub.
Related Articles

Big Tech firms are accelerating AI investments and integration, while regulators and companies focus on safety and responsible adoption.
Dev.to

Same Agent, Different Risk | How Microsoft 365 Copilot Grounding Changes the Security Model | Rahsi Framework™
Dev.to

Claude Haiku for Low-Cost AI Inference: Patterns from a Horse Racing Prediction System
Dev.to

How We Built an Ambient AI Clinical Documentation Pipeline (and Saved Doctors 8+ Hours a Week)
Dev.to

🦀 PicoClaw Deep Dive — A Field Guide to Building an Ultra-Light AI Agent in Go 🐹
Dev.to