Transformer-Based Predictive Maintenance for Risk-Aware Instrument Calibration

arXiv cs.LG / 3/24/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper frames instrument calibration scheduling as a predictive maintenance problem by estimating time-to-drift (TTD) from recent sensor histories and intervening before traceability/compliance violations occur.
  • It adapts the NASA C-MAPSS benchmark to calibration by selecting drift-sensitive sensors, defining virtual calibration thresholds, and using synthetic reset events to emulate repeated recalibration.
  • Experiments compare classical regressors, recurrent and convolutional sequence models, and a compact Transformer, with the Transformer achieving the best point forecasts on the FD001 split and strong competitiveness on FD002–FD004.
  • A quantile/uncertainty-aware approach is introduced to support conservative scheduling when drift is noisier, improving performance under a violation-aware cost model and reducing violations when point forecasts are less reliable.

Abstract

Accurate calibration is essential for instruments whose measurements must remain traceable, reliable, and compliant over long operating periods. Fixed-interval programs are easy to administer, but they ignore that instruments drift at different rates under different conditions. This paper studies calibration scheduling as a predictive maintenance problem: given recent sensor histories, estimate time-to-drift (TTD) and intervene before a violation occurs. We adapt the NASA C-MAPSS benchmark into a calibration setting by selecting drift-sensitive sensors, defining virtual calibration thresholds, and inserting synthetic reset events that emulate repeated recalibration. We then compare classical regressors, recurrent and convolutional sequence models, and a compact Transformer for TTD prediction. The Transformer provides the strongest point forecasts on the primary FD001 split and remains competitive on the harder FD002--FD004 splits, while a quantile-based uncertainty model supports conservative scheduling when drift behavior is noisier. Under a violation-aware cost model, predictive scheduling lowers cost relative to reactive and fixed policies, and uncertainty-aware triggers sharply reduce violations when point forecasts are less reliable. The results show that condition-based calibration can be framed as a joint forecasting and decision problem, and that combining sequence models with risk-aware policies is a practical route toward smarter calibration planning.