Abstract
We report a reproducible error pattern in GPT-5.4 on OWL~2~DL compliance queries: the model frequently answers ``unknown'' when the reasoner-entailed answer is ``no'' under \emph{FunctionalProperty} closure or class \emph{disjointness}. Using 180 reasoner-audited queries from a procedural expansion of the observed pattern plus 18 hand-authored held-out queries in two unrelated domains (insurance and clinical), we compare four interaction modes under matched query budget: single-shot, three rounds of generic ``you-are-wrong'' retry, three rounds of reasoner-verdict repair with an open-world-assumption (OWA) hint, and the same repair without the hint. Direct faithfulness is 43.9\,\% (Wilson 95\,\% CI [36.8,51.2]); generic retry reaches 81.7\,\% ([75.4,86.6]); the verdict-with-hint variant is \emph{worse} at 67.2\,\% ([60.1,73.7]); the verdict-only variant reaches 97.8\,\% ([94.4,99.1]). All pairwise comparisons remain significant under McNemar's exact test with Bonferroni correction (\alpha = 0.01; all p < 10^{-5}). The same fingerprint accounts for 4/4 errors on the held-out queries. Our interpretation is bounded: prompt framing can matter more than corrective content, and reasoner-guided wrappers should be ablated explicitly.
