Generative AI and Litigation Trends 2026: NYT / Getty / RIAA

AI Navigate Original / 4/27/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIndustry & Market Moves
共有:

Key Points

  • Training-data lawsuits surged; fair use vs infringement diverges by region
  • NYT/Getty/RIAA key cases; RIAA settled into license deals
  • Japan: voice/illustration disputes, ACA guideline, licensing businesses
  • New: lawyer liability for AI hallucination; verify before submission

The Landscape Changed in 2024-2026

Since generative AI spread in 2023, training-data lawsuits surged worldwide. The central issue: "is unauthorized training fair use or copyright infringement?" Case law is accumulating, with conclusions diverging by region. Here are the main cases.

Text

NYT v. OpenAI / Microsoft (filed 2023.12)

The New York Times presented 100+ examples of "ChatGPT verbatim-reproducing NYT articles." It argues both unauthorized training-data use and brand dilution. A settlement or ruling in 2025-2026 is expected, an important suit that will be the industry's benchmark.

Others

  • Authors Guild v. OpenAI (unauthorized training on books)
  • Newspapers like Wall Street Journal, CNN, Daily Mail filing one after another
  • OpenAI also concludes license contracts with AP, Axel Springer in parallel

Image

Getty Images v. Stability AI (US filed 2023.2, UK filed 2023.1)

Stock-photo giant Getty argues "Stable Diffusion trained on Getty's watermarked images." The UK ruling (2025) is partly favorable to Getty; the US continues into 2026. It includes the trademark-dilution issue, making it composite.

Artist Class Actions

  • Sarah Andersen et al. v. Stability AI / Midjourney / DeviantArt
  • Class action by Karla Ortiz et al. (US California)
  • Issues: copyright scope of style imitation, legality of style transfer

Music

RIAA v. Suno / Udio (filed 2024.6 → 2025 settlement reported)

Sign up to read the full article

Create a free account to access the full content of our original articles.