Computer Science > Machine Learning
arXiv:2603.09950 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Mar 2026]
Title:When Learning Rates Go Wrong: Early Structural Signals in PPO Actor-Critic
Authors:Alberto Fernández-Hernández, Cristian Pérez-Corral, Jose I. Mestre, Manuel F. Dolz, Jose Duato, Enrique S. Quintana-Ortí
View a PDF of the paper titled When Learning Rates Go Wrong: Early Structural Signals in PPO Actor-Critic, by Alberto Fern\'andez-Hern\'andez and 5 other authors
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Deep Reinforcement Learning systems are highly sensitive to the learning rate (LR), and selecting stable and performant training runs often requires extensive hyperparameter search. In Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) actor--critic methods, small LR values lead to slow convergence, whereas large LR values may induce instability or collapse. We analyse this phenomenon from the behavior of the hidden neurons in the network using the Overfitting-Underfitting Indicator (OUI), a metric that quantifies the balance of binary activation patterns over a fixed probe batch. We introduce an efficient batch-based formulation of OUI and derive a theoretical connection between LR and activation sign changes, clarifying how a correct evolution of the neuron's inner structure depends on the step size.
Empirically, across three discrete-control environments and multiple seeds, we show that OUI measured at only 10\% of training already discriminates between LR regimes. We observe a consistent asymmetry: critic networks achieving highest return operate in an intermediate OUI band (avoiding saturation), whereas actor networks achieving highest return exhibit comparatively high OUI values. We then compare OUI-based screening rules against early return, clip-based, divergence-based, and flip-based criteria under matched recall over successful runs. In this setting, OUI provides the strongest early screening signal: OUI alone achieves the best precision at broader recall, while combining early return with OUI yields the highest precision in best-performing screening regimes, enabling aggressive pruning of unpromising runs without requiring full training.
| Subjects: | Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2603.09950 [cs.LG] |
| (or arXiv:2603.09950v1 [cs.LG] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.09950
Focus to learn more
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Alberto Fernández-Hernández [view email][v1] Tue, 10 Mar 2026 17:46:31 UTC (283 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled When Learning Rates Go Wrong: Early Structural Signals in PPO Actor-Critic, by Alberto Fern\'andez-Hern\'andez and 5 other authors
References & Citations
export BibTeX citation
Loading...
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Links to Code Toggle
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender
(What is IArxiv?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.




