AI Navigate

TSDCRF: Balancing Privacy and Multi-Object Tracking via Time-Series CRF and Normalized Control Penalty

arXiv cs.CV / 3/17/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • TSDCRF is a plug-in refinement framework for privacy-preserving multi-object tracking that combines (i) (ε,δ)-differential privacy via calibrated Gaussian noise, (ii) a Normalized Control Penalty to down-weight unstable or conflicting predictions before noise injection, and (iii) a time-series dynamic conditional random field to enforce temporal consistency.
  • The approach operates under a configurable privacy budget and aims to balance privacy with tracking fidelity by stabilizing associations against noise-induced degradation.
  • It is detector- and tracker-agnostic (e.g., compatible with YOLOv4 and DeepSORT) and demonstrates improved privacy–utility trade-offs on standard benchmarks.
  • The method reports lower KL-divergence shift, lower tracking RMSE, and greater resilience to trajectory hijacking compared with white noise and prior methods like NTPD and PPDTSA, across MOT16, MOT17, Cityscapes, and KITTI.
  • Source code for TSDCRF is publicly available at https://github.com/mabo1215/TSDCRF.git.

Abstract

Multi-object tracking in video often requires appearance or location cues that can reveal sensitive identity information, while adding privacy-preserving noise typically disrupts cross-frame association and causes ID switches or target loss. We propose TSDCRF, a plug-in refinement framework that balances privacy and tracking by combining three components: (i) (\varepsilon,\delta)-differential privacy via calibrated Gaussian noise on sensitive regions under a configurable privacy budget; (ii) a Normalized Control Penalty (NCP) that down-weights unstable or conflicting class predictions before noise injection to stabilize association; and (iii) a time-series dynamic conditional random field (DCRF) that enforces temporal consistency and corrects trajectory deviation after noise, mitigating ID switches and resilience to trajectory hijacking. The pipeline is agnostic to the choice of detector and tracker (e.g., YOLOv4 and DeepSORT). We evaluate on MOT16, MOT17, Cityscapes, and KITTI. Results show that TSDCRF achieves a better privacy--utility trade-off than white noise and prior methods (NTPD, PPDTSA): lower KL-divergence shift, lower tracking RMSE, and improved robustness under trajectory hijacking while preserving privacy. Source code in https://github.com/mabo1215/TSDCRF.git