Evaluating Synthetic Images as Effective Substitutes for Experimental Data in Surface Roughness Classification

arXiv cs.CV / 3/30/2026

💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper investigates whether synthetic surface images generated with Stable Diffusion XL can replace or augment experimentally captured data for ceramic surface roughness classification.
  • It reports that adding generative images to real datasets can achieve test accuracy comparable to using only experimental images, suggesting synthetic images preserve relevant structural features.
  • The authors evaluate robustness by varying training hyperparameters such as epoch count, batch size, and learning rate, and they identify settings that maintain performance while lowering required data.
  • The study concludes that generative AI can improve data efficiency and reliability in materials-image classification, potentially reducing experimental cost and speeding up model development for materials engineering.
  • Overall, the work frames synthetic-data generation as a practical way to expand where AI can be applied despite limitations in labeled data and expensive high-resolution imaging.

Abstract

Hard coatings play a critical role in industry, with ceramic materials offering outstanding hardness and thermal stability for applications that demand superior mechanical performance. However, deploying artificial intelligence (AI) for surface roughness classification is often constrained by the need for large labeled datasets and costly high-resolution imaging equipment. In this study, we explore the use of synthetic images, generated with Stable Diffusion XL, as an efficient alternative or supplement to experimentally acquired data for classifying ceramic surface roughness. We show that augmenting authentic datasets with generative images yields test accuracies comparable to those obtained using exclusively experimental images, demonstrating that synthetic images effectively reproduce the structural features necessary for classification. We further assess method robustness by systematically varying key training hyperparameters (epoch count, batch size, and learning rate), and identify configurations that preserve performance while reducing data requirements. Our results indicate that generative AI can substantially improve data efficiency and reliability in materials-image classification workflows, offering a practical route to lower experimental cost, accelerate model development, and expand AI applicability in materials engineering.