[D] thoughts on the controversy about Google's new paper?

Reddit r/MachineLearning / 3/30/2026

💬 OpinionIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

共有:

Key Points

A Reddit user raises concerns about controversy surrounding Google’s new paper, noting that few people discuss it and that critics who point out issues are met with hostility.
The post alleges that the work may not properly attribute prior research, specifically referencing concerns about whether “RaBitQ” was credited fully.
It also claims the paper includes an unfair comparison versus RaBitQ, citing differences in hardware assumptions (single-core CPU versus GPU).
The user links to the relevant OpenReview thread and frames the discussion as a debate over research attribution and experimental fairness rather than a purely technical evaluation.
An edit suggests the alleged conduct is associated with Google’s “trending TurboQuant” paper, tying the controversy to a specific research direction.
categories: Array of category slugs.

It's sad to see almost no one mention this on Reddit and people are being mean to people who point out concerns

Edit: google is allegedly doing this in their trending TurboQuant paper