Neyman-Pearson multiclass classification under label noise via empirical likelihood

Abstract

In many classification problems, the costs of misclassifying observations from different classes can be highly unequal. The Neyman-Pearson multiclass classification (NPMC) framework addresses this issue by minimizing a weighted misclassification risk while imposing upper bounds on class-specific error probabilities. Existing NPMC methods typically assume that training labels are correctly observed. In practice, however, labels are often corrupted due to measurement error or annotation, and the effect of such label noise on NPMC procedures remains largely unexplored. We study the NPMC problem when only noisy labels are available in the training data. We propose an empirical likelihood (EL)-based method that relates the distributions of noisy and true labels through an exponential tilting density ratio model. The resulting maximum EL estimators recover the class proportions and posterior probabilities of the clean labels required for error control. We establish consistency, asymptotic normality, and optimal convergence rates for these estimators. Under mild conditions, the resulting classifier satisfies NP oracle inequalities with respect to the true labels asymptotically. An expectation-maximization algorithm computes the maximum EL estimators. Simulations show that the proposed method performs comparably to the oracle classifier under clean labels and substantially improves over procedures that ignore label noise.