Mind over Space: Can Multimodal Large Language Models Mentally Navigate?

arXiv cs.AI / 2026/3/24

💬 オピニオンSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

要点

  • The paper argues that multimodal large language models (MLLMs) used in embodied agents often lack true spatial reasoning over long time and space, instead relying mainly on reactive planning from immediate observations.
  • It introduces Video2Mental, a new benchmark that tests “mental navigation” by requiring hierarchical cognitive map construction from long egocentric videos and landmark-based path planning verified via simulator-based physical interaction.
  • Benchmark results show that standard pre-training does not naturally produce mental navigation abilities, with zero-shot structured spatial representation performing poorly and planning accuracy degrading sharply over longer horizons.
  • To address this, the authors propose NavMind, a reasoning model that uses explicit fine-grained cognitive maps as learnable intermediate representations and is trained via difficulty-stratified progressive supervised fine-tuning.
  • Experiments indicate NavMind substantially outperforms frontier commercial and other spatial MLLMs on mental-navigation performance within the proposed evaluation framework.

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of MLLMs in embodied agents, their capabilities remain largely confined to reactive planning from immediate observations, consistently failing in spatial reasoning across extensive spatiotemporal scales. Cognitive science reveals that Biological Intelligence (BI) thrives on "mental navigation": the strategic construction of spatial representations from experience and the subsequent mental simulation of paths prior to action. To bridge the gap between AI and BI, we introduce Video2Mental, a pioneering benchmark for evaluating the mental navigation capabilities of MLLMs. The task requires constructing hierarchical cognitive maps from long egocentric videos and generating landmark-based path plans step by step, with planning accuracy verified through simulator-based physical interaction. Our benchmarking results reveal that mental navigation capability does not naturally emerge from standard pre-training. Frontier MLLMs struggle profoundly with zero-shot structured spatial representation, and their planning accuracy decays precipitously over extended horizons. To overcome this, we propose \textbf{NavMind}, a reasoning model that internalizes mental navigation using explicit, fine-grained cognitive maps as learnable intermediate representations. Through a difficulty-stratified progressive supervised fine-tuning paradigm, NavMind effectively bridges the gap between raw perception and structured planning. Experiments demonstrate that NavMind achieves superior mental navigation capabilities, significantly outperforming frontier commercial and spatial MLLMs.