AI Navigate

HEP Statistical Inference for UAV Fault Detection: CLs, LRT, and SBI Applied to Blade Damage

arXiv cs.LG / 3/20/2026

📰 NewsIdeas & Deep AnalysisModels & Research

Key Points

  • The paper transfers three statistical methods from particle physics (LRT, CLs, and SNPE) to UAV blade-damage fault detection, enabling binary detection, controlled false alarm rates, and calibrated posteriors over fault severity and motor location.
  • On hexarotor data with 5% and 10% blade damage using leave-one-flight-out cross-validation, the approach achieves an AUC of 0.862, outperforming CUSUM, autoencoder, and LSTM autoencoder baselines.
  • At a 5% false alarm rate, the system detects 93% of significant and 81% of subtle blade damage, demonstrating strong sensitivity under controlled FPR.
  • SNPE yields full posterior distributions for fault severity and location (with credible interval coverage and MAE metrics), and per-flight sequential detection reaches 100% fault detection with 94% overall accuracy.

Abstract

This paper transfers three statistical methods from particle physics to multirotor propeller fault detection: the likelihood ratio test (LRT) for binary detection, the CLs modified frequentist method for false alarm rate control, and sequential neural posterior estimation (SNPE) for quantitative fault characterization. Operating on spectral features tied to rotor harmonic physics, the system returns three outputs: binary detection, controlled false alarm rates, and calibrated posteriors over fault severity and motor location. On UAV-FD, a hexarotor dataset of 18 real flights with 5% and 10% blade damage, leave-one-flight-out cross-validation gives AUC 0.862 +/- 0.007 (95% CI: 0.849--0.876), outperforming CUSUM (0.708 +/- 0.010), autoencoder (0.753 +/- 0.009), and LSTM autoencoder (0.551). At 5% false alarm rate the system detects 93% of significant and 81% of subtle blade damage. On PADRE, a quadrotor platform, AUC reaches 0.986 after refitting only the generative models. SNPE gives a full posterior over fault severity (90% credible interval coverage 92--100%, MAE 0.012), so the output includes uncertainty rather than just a point estimate or fault flag. Per-flight sequential detection achieves 100% fault detection with 94% overall accuracy.