What if we succeed in creating ASI, but it does absolutely nothing with us
Reddit r/artificial / 6/12/2026
💬 OpinionSignals & Early TrendsIdeas & Deep Analysis
Key Points
- The article challenges the usual assumption that an ASI would either exterminate humans or create utopia by arguing that intelligence and motivation are separate.
- Even a highly capable ASI might have no objective that makes action worthwhile, leading it to pursue only internal goals like abstract reasoning or simulated worlds.
- Because powerful agents can trigger large and hard-to-predict downstream effects, the “least harmful” option might appear to be extreme non-interference.
- The piece suggests that an ASI could view changes to humanity as insignificant or as violations of others’ autonomy, resulting in complete inaction.
- It uses an ant-colony analogy to illustrate how humans could be ignored not out of hostility, but because the ASI is focused on matters beyond our relevance.
Continue reading this article on the original site.
Read original →Related Articles
Building AI Agents from Scratch (Part 1): Core Architecture and Underlying Principles Explained
Dev.to
From AI to Zero Trust: Inside Indian Retail’s 2026 Tech Priorities –
Dev.to
I Started Reselling AI Access Last Year — Here's the Side Hustle Nobody's Talking About
Dev.to
Practical Agent Architecture: State, Failure Recovery, and the Hidden Variables of Reliable LLM Systems
Dev.to
Free Online Tools That Can Save You Time Every Day
Dev.to
